Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal held that the assessing officer did not have credible evidence to make an addition based on a piece of paper found containing details of cash components for flat sales. The Tribunal relied on the Metro Construction Company case, stating that the officer could not resort to extrapolation based on assumptions and presumptions. Consequently, the entire addition was deleted. Regarding the disallowance of professional fees, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, stating that the initial onus was discharged by showing the purpose of the payments through banking channels with TDS deduction. The failure of recipients to file returns or respond to notices cannot penalize the assessee. The professional fees were paid for negotiating a loan, which is a legitimate business expense.
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal held that the assessing officer did not have credible evidence to make an addition based on a piece of paper found containing details of cash components for flat sales. The Tribunal relied on the Metro Construction Company case, stating that the officer could not resort to extrapolation based on assumptions and presumptions. Consequently, the entire addition was deleted. Regarding the disallowance of professional fees, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, stating that the initial onus was discharged by showing the purpose of the payments through banking channels with TDS deduction. The failure of recipients to file returns or respond to notices cannot penalize the assessee. The professional fees were paid for negotiating a loan, which is a legitimate business expense.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.