Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal held that the assessing officer did not have credible evidence to make an addition based on a piece of paper found containing details of cash components for flat sales. The Tribunal relied on the Metro Construction Company case, stating that the officer could not resort to extrapolation based on assumptions and presumptions. Consequently, the entire addition was deleted. Regarding the disallowance of professional fees, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, stating that the initial onus was discharged by showing the purpose of the payments through banking channels with TDS deduction. The failure of recipients to file returns or respond to notices cannot penalize the assessee. The professional fees were paid for negotiating a loan, which is a legitimate business expense.
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal held that the assessing officer did not have credible evidence to make an addition based on a piece of paper found containing details of cash components for flat sales. The Tribunal relied on the Metro Construction Company case, stating that the officer could not resort to extrapolation based on assumptions and presumptions. Consequently, the entire addition was deleted. Regarding the disallowance of professional fees, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, stating that the initial onus was discharged by showing the purpose of the payments through banking channels with TDS deduction. The failure of recipients to file returns or respond to notices cannot penalize the assessee. The professional fees were paid for negotiating a loan, which is a legitimate business expense.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.