Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The High Court dismissed the petition, holding that the petitioners should avail the alternate remedy of appeal instead. It was not a case of complete lack of opportunity or notice, but rather an alleged lack of adequate opportunity. Mere allegation of non-furnishing of some documents is insufficient; the impact and relevance of such documents need to be examined. The Appellate Tribunal u/s 129B of the Customs Act has substantial powers to pass appropriate orders after considering additional evidence, if necessary. Therefore, the available appeal remedy is efficacious, and no case is made out for entertaining the petitions instead of relegating the petitioners to the appeal process. The petitioners are free to appeal the impugned order dated June 28, 2024.
The High Court dismissed the petition, holding that the petitioners should avail the alternate remedy of appeal instead. It was not a case of complete lack of opportunity or notice, but rather an alleged lack of adequate opportunity. Mere allegation of non-furnishing of some documents is insufficient; the impact and relevance of such documents need to be examined. The Appellate Tribunal u/s 129B of the Customs Act has substantial powers to pass appropriate orders after considering additional evidence, if necessary. Therefore, the available appeal remedy is efficacious, and no case is made out for entertaining the petitions instead of relegating the petitioners to the appeal process. The petitioners are free to appeal the impugned order dated June 28, 2024.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.