Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The petitioners, members/office bearers of the banned organization PFI, were alleged to have collected funds from unknown sources and provided fake receipts to utilize those funds for terrorist activities (scheduled offences). The court held that the proceeds of crime has to be generated as a result of criminal activity (scheduled offence), but in the present case, the collection of funds preceded the alleged crime (Delhi Riots). Therefore, prima facie, the offence of money laundering was not made out against the petitioners. Considering the delay in trial and long incarceration, and invoking Article 21 (right to life and personal liberty), the court directed the release of petitioners Parvez Ahmed, Mohd Ilyas, and Abdul Muqeet on bail, subject to fulfillment of terms and conditions.
The petitioners, members/office bearers of the banned organization PFI, were alleged to have collected funds from unknown sources and provided fake receipts to utilize those funds for terrorist activities (scheduled offences). The court held that the proceeds of crime has to be generated as a result of criminal activity (scheduled offence), but in the present case, the collection of funds preceded the alleged crime (Delhi Riots). Therefore, prima facie, the offence of money laundering was not made out against the petitioners. Considering the delay in trial and long incarceration, and invoking Article 21 (right to life and personal liberty), the court directed the release of petitioners Parvez Ahmed, Mohd Ilyas, and Abdul Muqeet on bail, subject to fulfillment of terms and conditions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
