Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The petitioners, members/office bearers of the banned organization PFI, were alleged to have collected funds from unknown sources and provided fake receipts to utilize those funds for terrorist activities (scheduled offences). The court held that the proceeds of crime has to be generated as a result of criminal activity (scheduled offence), but in the present case, the collection of funds preceded the alleged crime (Delhi Riots). Therefore, prima facie, the offence of money laundering was not made out against the petitioners. Considering the delay in trial and long incarceration, and invoking Article 21 (right to life and personal liberty), the court directed the release of petitioners Parvez Ahmed, Mohd Ilyas, and Abdul Muqeet on bail, subject to fulfillment of terms and conditions.
The petitioners, members/office bearers of the banned organization PFI, were alleged to have collected funds from unknown sources and provided fake receipts to utilize those funds for terrorist activities (scheduled offences). The court held that the proceeds of crime has to be generated as a result of criminal activity (scheduled offence), but in the present case, the collection of funds preceded the alleged crime (Delhi Riots). Therefore, prima facie, the offence of money laundering was not made out against the petitioners. Considering the delay in trial and long incarceration, and invoking Article 21 (right to life and personal liberty), the court directed the release of petitioners Parvez Ahmed, Mohd Ilyas, and Abdul Muqeet on bail, subject to fulfillment of terms and conditions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
