Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The Appellate Tribunal set aside the Provisional Attachment Order passed under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. The order was found unsustainable as it was based on allegations from an initial FIR that pertained to undervaluation of reserve price during an auction, which had already been held erroneous by the Additional Sessions Judge and the Bombay High Court. The attachment order stemmed from a separate 2019 FIR regarding irregularities in cooperative societies' lending and borrowing practices, unconnected to the facts of the initial FIR relied upon. Consequently, the appeal against the Provisional Attachment Order was allowed.
The Appellate Tribunal set aside the Provisional Attachment Order passed under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. The order was found unsustainable as it was based on allegations from an initial FIR that pertained to undervaluation of reserve price during an auction, which had already been held erroneous by the Additional Sessions Judge and the Bombay High Court. The attachment order stemmed from a separate 2019 FIR regarding irregularities in cooperative societies' lending and borrowing practices, unconnected to the facts of the initial FIR relied upon. Consequently, the appeal against the Provisional Attachment Order was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
