Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
Page of 4830
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
181 to 200 of 96587 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Appellate Tribunal set aside the Provisional Attachment Order passed under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. The order was found unsustainable as it was based on allegations from an initial FIR that pertained to undervaluation of reserve price during an auction, which had already been held erroneous by the Additional Sessions Judge and the Bombay High Court. The attachment order stemmed from a separate 2019 FIR regarding irregularities in cooperative societies' lending and borrowing practices, unconnected to the facts of the initial FIR relied upon. Consequently, the appeal against the Provisional Attachment Order was allowed.
The Appellate Tribunal set aside the Provisional Attachment Order passed under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. The order was found unsustainable as it was based on allegations from an initial FIR that pertained to undervaluation of reserve price during an auction, which had already been held erroneous by the Additional Sessions Judge and the Bombay High Court. The attachment order stemmed from a separate 2019 FIR regarding irregularities in cooperative societies' lending and borrowing practices, unconnected to the facts of the initial FIR relied upon. Consequently, the appeal against the Provisional Attachment Order was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.