Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the attachment of properties under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) 2002. Despite acquittals in some cases, the Enforcement Case Information Report (ECIR) and cognizance of the money laundering offence remained against the accused. The irregular cash deposits in bank accounts, failure to disclose the source of cash used for property acquisitions, and the routing of funds through multiple persons without justification, led the Adjudicating Authority to conclude that the properties were acquired from proceeds of crime. The Income Tax Returns did not sufficiently establish the lawful source of income. The Tribunal found no reason to interfere with the order attaching the properties.
The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the attachment of properties under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) 2002. Despite acquittals in some cases, the Enforcement Case Information Report (ECIR) and cognizance of the money laundering offence remained against the accused. The irregular cash deposits in bank accounts, failure to disclose the source of cash used for property acquisitions, and the routing of funds through multiple persons without justification, led the Adjudicating Authority to conclude that the properties were acquired from proceeds of crime. The Income Tax Returns did not sufficiently establish the lawful source of income. The Tribunal found no reason to interfere with the order attaching the properties.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
