Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
The High Court upheld the validity of reassessment u/s 153C and rejected the contention of reopening assessment u/s 147. The Assessing Officer relied on the material seized during the search for making additions in the assessees' hands. The Court affirmed the estimation of income on bogus purchases by the Tribunal at 6%, as it concurred with the reasoned decision of the fact-finding authorities. Consistent with similar cases involving accommodation entries, the 6% addition on estimated purchases maintained.
The High Court upheld the validity of reassessment u/s 153C and rejected the contention of reopening assessment u/s 147. The Assessing Officer relied on the material seized during the search for making additions in the assessees' hands. The Court affirmed the estimation of income on bogus purchases by the Tribunal at 6%, as it concurred with the reasoned decision of the fact-finding authorities. Consistent with similar cases involving accommodation entries, the 6% addition on estimated purchases maintained.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.