Overlapping GST proceedings require Central and State authorities to designate one competent authority for coordinated adjudication of the same matter...
Composite healthcare supplies retain exemption when patient care is the contract's essential character, despite payment through an implementing agency...
Receipt of immovable property requires actual possession or enjoyment; redevelopment allotments exchanged for tenancy rights fall outside deemed incom...
Section 80P deduction covers Souharda credit societies, including qualifying surplus-deposit interest, subject to member KYC verification for cash dep...
The High Court upheld the validity of reassessment u/s 153C and rejected the contention of reopening assessment u/s 147. The Assessing Officer relied on the material seized during the search for making additions in the assessees' hands. The Court affirmed the estimation of income on bogus purchases by the Tribunal at 6%, as it concurred with the reasoned decision of the fact-finding authorities. Consistent with similar cases involving accommodation entries, the 6% addition on estimated purchases maintained.
The High Court upheld the validity of reassessment u/s 153C and rejected the contention of reopening assessment u/s 147. The Assessing Officer relied on the material seized during the search for making additions in the assessees' hands. The Court affirmed the estimation of income on bogus purchases by the Tribunal at 6%, as it concurred with the reasoned decision of the fact-finding authorities. Consistent with similar cases involving accommodation entries, the 6% addition on estimated purchases maintained.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.