Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Specified fund definition expands PAN exemption eligibility for registered alternative investment funds and qualifying International Financial Service...
Tax exemption for specified legal-services authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
701 to 720 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The High Court allowed the petition and permitted the petitioner to obtain Form 10IC for the Assessment Year 2021 and make a fresh application. The court relied on Wipro Limited [2022 (7) TMI 560 - Supreme Court] and held that the respondent was required to consider the facts of the case by permitting the petitioner to file a fresh Form 10IC and condoning the delay in filing such Form u/s 119(2)(b) of the Act. The provisions of Section 119(2)(b) are meant for redressal of grievances and hardships caused to the petitioner. The petitioner had adopted the option for taxation u/s 115BAA of the Act, which grants relief to companies by enabling them to pay a reduced tax rate of 22% subject to certain conditions.
The High Court allowed the petition and permitted the petitioner to obtain Form 10IC for the Assessment Year 2021 and make a fresh application. The court relied on Wipro Limited [2022 (7) TMI 560 - Supreme Court] and held that the respondent was required to consider the facts of the case by permitting the petitioner to file a fresh Form 10IC and condoning the delay in filing such Form u/s 119(2)(b) of the Act. The provisions of Section 119(2)(b) are meant for redressal of grievances and hardships caused to the petitioner. The petitioner had adopted the option for taxation u/s 115BAA of the Act, which grants relief to companies by enabling them to pay a reduced tax rate of 22% subject to certain conditions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
