Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
The High Court allowed the petition and directed the tax authorities to accept the petitioner's Forms 1 and 2 under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act and issue a fresh Certificate in Form 3 within four weeks, granting waiver of the entire interest amount determined in the assessment orders. The Court held that no distinction has been made between waiver of interest on disputed taxes and interest on tax not in dispute u/s 3 of the Act. The tax authorities had erroneously calculated interest by not granting complete waiver, which was contrary to the provisions of the Act. The petitioner undertook to withdraw pending appeals/rectification applications expeditiously.
The High Court allowed the petition and directed the tax authorities to accept the petitioner's Forms 1 and 2 under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act and issue a fresh Certificate in Form 3 within four weeks, granting waiver of the entire interest amount determined in the assessment orders. The Court held that no distinction has been made between waiver of interest on disputed taxes and interest on tax not in dispute u/s 3 of the Act. The tax authorities had erroneously calculated interest by not granting complete waiver, which was contrary to the provisions of the Act. The petitioner undertook to withdraw pending appeals/rectification applications expeditiously.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
