Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
The issue pertained to the inclusion of demurrage charges in the assessable value for payment of customs duty under the Customs Valuation (Determination of Value of Imported Goods) Rules, 2007. The Tribunal relied on the decision of the Orissa High Court in the case of Tata Steel Ltd. and Others v. Union of India and Others, wherein the High Court held that demurrage charges are not included as part of the cost envisaged by the legislation for determining the assessable value. Consequently, the Tribunal ruled that demurrage charges cannot be included in the assessable value for payment of customs duty.
The issue pertained to the inclusion of demurrage charges in the assessable value for payment of customs duty under the Customs Valuation (Determination of Value of Imported Goods) Rules, 2007. The Tribunal relied on the decision of the Orissa High Court in the case of Tata Steel Ltd. and Others v. Union of India and Others, wherein the High Court held that demurrage charges are not included as part of the cost envisaged by the legislation for determining the assessable value. Consequently, the Tribunal ruled that demurrage charges cannot be included in the assessable value for payment of customs duty.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
