Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
The issue pertained to the inclusion of demurrage charges in the assessable value for payment of customs duty under the Customs Valuation (Determination of Value of Imported Goods) Rules, 2007. The Tribunal relied on the decision of the Orissa High Court in the case of Tata Steel Ltd. and Others v. Union of India and Others, wherein the High Court held that demurrage charges are not included as part of the cost envisaged by the legislation for determining the assessable value. Consequently, the Tribunal ruled that demurrage charges cannot be included in the assessable value for payment of customs duty.
The issue pertained to the inclusion of demurrage charges in the assessable value for payment of customs duty under the Customs Valuation (Determination of Value of Imported Goods) Rules, 2007. The Tribunal relied on the decision of the Orissa High Court in the case of Tata Steel Ltd. and Others v. Union of India and Others, wherein the High Court held that demurrage charges are not included as part of the cost envisaged by the legislation for determining the assessable value. Consequently, the Tribunal ruled that demurrage charges cannot be included in the assessable value for payment of customs duty.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
