Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
The NCLAT held that the moratorium u/s 14 of the IBC shall not impede the invocation of an irrevocable bank guarantee, which is an independent and separate contract between the parties. If the bank guarantee is invoked and any amount is received by Respondent No. 1, their claim has to be revised as intimated by the IRP. The Appellate Tribunal found no error committed by the Adjudicating Authority in allowing the application filed by the Respondent and dismissed the appeal.
The NCLAT held that the moratorium u/s 14 of the IBC shall not impede the invocation of an irrevocable bank guarantee, which is an independent and separate contract between the parties. If the bank guarantee is invoked and any amount is received by Respondent No. 1, their claim has to be revised as intimated by the IRP. The Appellate Tribunal found no error committed by the Adjudicating Authority in allowing the application filed by the Respondent and dismissed the appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
