Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Specified fund definition expands PAN exemption eligibility for registered alternative investment funds and qualifying International Financial Service...
Tax exemption for specified legal-services authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
701 to 720 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The High Court dismissed the challenge to the assessment order regarding wrongful availing of input tax credit. The court found the petitioner's claim of surrendering registration under TNVAT Act and CST Act on 25.12.2014 implausible, as it was a holiday and an acknowledgment would not have been issued on that date. The court directed the respondents to verify from which IP address the transactions were made for filing returns in the petitioner's name during the disputed period, facilitating wrongful availing of input tax credit and passing it to unscrupulous dealers.
The High Court dismissed the challenge to the assessment order regarding wrongful availing of input tax credit. The court found the petitioner's claim of surrendering registration under TNVAT Act and CST Act on 25.12.2014 implausible, as it was a holiday and an acknowledgment would not have been issued on that date. The court directed the respondents to verify from which IP address the transactions were made for filing returns in the petitioner's name during the disputed period, facilitating wrongful availing of input tax credit and passing it to unscrupulous dealers.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
