Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
The High Court dismissed the challenge to the assessment order regarding wrongful availing of input tax credit. The court found the petitioner's claim of surrendering registration under TNVAT Act and CST Act on 25.12.2014 implausible, as it was a holiday and an acknowledgment would not have been issued on that date. The court directed the respondents to verify from which IP address the transactions were made for filing returns in the petitioner's name during the disputed period, facilitating wrongful availing of input tax credit and passing it to unscrupulous dealers.
The High Court dismissed the challenge to the assessment order regarding wrongful availing of input tax credit. The court found the petitioner's claim of surrendering registration under TNVAT Act and CST Act on 25.12.2014 implausible, as it was a holiday and an acknowledgment would not have been issued on that date. The court directed the respondents to verify from which IP address the transactions were made for filing returns in the petitioner's name during the disputed period, facilitating wrongful availing of input tax credit and passing it to unscrupulous dealers.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4790
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
