Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
The ITAT held that the assessee's 5% markup charged for intra-group services was at arm's length based on benchmarking analysis using the Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM). It ruled that tax authorities cannot question commercial decisions or quantum of fees, but can only examine if services were actually rendered and transactions were genuine. Relying on judicial precedents, the ITAT directed the TPO to delete the impugned transfer pricing adjustment.
The ITAT held that the assessee's 5% markup charged for intra-group services was at arm's length based on benchmarking analysis using the Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM). It ruled that tax authorities cannot question commercial decisions or quantum of fees, but can only examine if services were actually rendered and transactions were genuine. Relying on judicial precedents, the ITAT directed the TPO to delete the impugned transfer pricing adjustment.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.