Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
The final assessment order passed by the Assessing Officer u/s 147 read with Section 144C(13) for the Assessment Year 2016-17 is quashed as barred by limitation. Except in cases of reference to the Transfer Pricing Officer, the extended time limit of 12 months for completion of assessment is not available in a case of Non-Resident assessment, even though covered u/s 144C of the Act. As per Section 153(4), the extended time limit of 12 months is not available for Non-Residents. The Assessing Officer ought to have completed the assessment within one year from the end of the financial year in which notice u/s 148 was served, as per Section 153(2). Considering the notice u/s 148 was served in April 2021, the time limit for completing the assessment u/s 147 was available up to 31.03.2023. Hence, the final assessment order dated 08.01.2024 is clearly barred by limitation and liable to be quashed.
The final assessment order passed by the Assessing Officer u/s 147 read with Section 144C(13) for the Assessment Year 2016-17 is quashed as barred by limitation. Except in cases of reference to the Transfer Pricing Officer, the extended time limit of 12 months for completion of assessment is not available in a case of Non-Resident assessment, even though covered u/s 144C of the Act. As per Section 153(4), the extended time limit of 12 months is not available for Non-Residents. The Assessing Officer ought to have completed the assessment within one year from the end of the financial year in which notice u/s 148 was served, as per Section 153(2). Considering the notice u/s 148 was served in April 2021, the time limit for completing the assessment u/s 147 was available up to 31.03.2023. Hence, the final assessment order dated 08.01.2024 is clearly barred by limitation and liable to be quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.