Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
The ITAT held that when the principal amount of income subjected to tax deducted at source (TDS) bears an element of uncertainty and irrecoverability, the TDS deposited by the deductor and reflected in Form 26AS of the deductee is deemed to be income received by the deductee u/s 198 of the Income Tax Act. The ITAT relied on the case of Y. Rathiesh [2014 (9) TMI 2 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT] and directed the Assessing Officer to recompute the assessed total income by treating the TDS amount reflected in Form 26AS as income from other sources for the assessee. The Revenue's ground was partly allowed.
The ITAT held that when the principal amount of income subjected to tax deducted at source (TDS) bears an element of uncertainty and irrecoverability, the TDS deposited by the deductor and reflected in Form 26AS of the deductee is deemed to be income received by the deductee u/s 198 of the Income Tax Act. The ITAT relied on the case of Y. Rathiesh [2014 (9) TMI 2 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT] and directed the Assessing Officer to recompute the assessed total income by treating the TDS amount reflected in Form 26AS as income from other sources for the assessee. The Revenue's ground was partly allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.