Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
The ITAT held that when the principal amount of income subjected to tax deducted at source (TDS) bears an element of uncertainty and irrecoverability, the TDS deposited by the deductor and reflected in Form 26AS of the deductee is deemed to be income received by the deductee u/s 198 of the Income Tax Act. The ITAT relied on the case of Y. Rathiesh [2014 (9) TMI 2 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT] and directed the Assessing Officer to recompute the assessed total income by treating the TDS amount reflected in Form 26AS as income from other sources for the assessee. The Revenue's ground was partly allowed.
The ITAT held that when the principal amount of income subjected to tax deducted at source (TDS) bears an element of uncertainty and irrecoverability, the TDS deposited by the deductor and reflected in Form 26AS of the deductee is deemed to be income received by the deductee u/s 198 of the Income Tax Act. The ITAT relied on the case of Y. Rathiesh [2014 (9) TMI 2 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT] and directed the Assessing Officer to recompute the assessed total income by treating the TDS amount reflected in Form 26AS as income from other sources for the assessee. The Revenue's ground was partly allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
