Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
The ITAT held that when the principal amount of income subjected to tax deducted at source (TDS) bears an element of uncertainty and irrecoverability, the TDS deposited by the deductor and reflected in Form 26AS of the deductee is deemed to be income received by the deductee u/s 198 of the Income Tax Act. The ITAT relied on the case of Y. Rathiesh [2014 (9) TMI 2 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT] and directed the Assessing Officer to recompute the assessed total income by treating the TDS amount reflected in Form 26AS as income from other sources for the assessee. The Revenue's ground was partly allowed.
The ITAT held that when the principal amount of income subjected to tax deducted at source (TDS) bears an element of uncertainty and irrecoverability, the TDS deposited by the deductor and reflected in Form 26AS of the deductee is deemed to be income received by the deductee u/s 198 of the Income Tax Act. The ITAT relied on the case of Y. Rathiesh [2014 (9) TMI 2 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT] and directed the Assessing Officer to recompute the assessed total income by treating the TDS amount reflected in Form 26AS as income from other sources for the assessee. The Revenue's ground was partly allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.