Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
The CESTAT held that the imported 'JOSS Powder (Wood Powder for making incense sticks)' was correctly described by the appellant in the Bills of Entry under Chapter Heading 4405, though classified under the same. As there was no mis-declaration or suppression of facts, the extended period of limitation could not be invoked. Consequently, the appeal was allowed.
The CESTAT held that the imported 'JOSS Powder (Wood Powder for making incense sticks)' was correctly described by the appellant in the Bills of Entry under Chapter Heading 4405, though classified under the same. As there was no mis-declaration or suppression of facts, the extended period of limitation could not be invoked. Consequently, the appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
