Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
381 to 400 of 96047 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The CESTAT held that the imported 'JOSS Powder (Wood Powder for making incense sticks)' was correctly described by the appellant in the Bills of Entry under Chapter Heading 4405, though classified under the same. As there was no mis-declaration or suppression of facts, the extended period of limitation could not be invoked. Consequently, the appeal was allowed.
The CESTAT held that the imported 'JOSS Powder (Wood Powder for making incense sticks)' was correctly described by the appellant in the Bills of Entry under Chapter Heading 4405, though classified under the same. As there was no mis-declaration or suppression of facts, the extended period of limitation could not be invoked. Consequently, the appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.