Business deductions and transfer pricing issues: tribunal treatment of software write-offs, donation receipts, warranty provisions, and related expens...
Equivalent value attachment under money laundering law upheld where received funds were treated as proceeds of crime and prior-acquired property could...
The CESTAT held that the imported 'JOSS Powder (Wood Powder for making incense sticks)' was correctly described by the appellant in the Bills of Entry under Chapter Heading 4405, though classified under the same. As there was no mis-declaration or suppression of facts, the extended period of limitation could not be invoked. Consequently, the appeal was allowed.
The CESTAT held that the imported 'JOSS Powder (Wood Powder for making incense sticks)' was correctly described by the appellant in the Bills of Entry under Chapter Heading 4405, though classified under the same. As there was no mis-declaration or suppression of facts, the extended period of limitation could not be invoked. Consequently, the appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.