Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
The appellant failed to prove the legitimate source for acquisition of the subject property, and the Appellate Tribunal upheld the Provisional Attachment Order treating the amount as proceeds of crime derived from NRHM funds. The prosecution complaint was filed within the prescribed time limit. At this interim stage, the attachment of properties continues till the final disposal of the prosecution case. The appeal regarding seizure of Rs. 9.50 lakh, treated as proceeds of crime, was also dismissed as the appellant could not provide authentic evidence for the cash transactions.
The appellant failed to prove the legitimate source for acquisition of the subject property, and the Appellate Tribunal upheld the Provisional Attachment Order treating the amount as proceeds of crime derived from NRHM funds. The prosecution complaint was filed within the prescribed time limit. At this interim stage, the attachment of properties continues till the final disposal of the prosecution case. The appeal regarding seizure of Rs. 9.50 lakh, treated as proceeds of crime, was also dismissed as the appellant could not provide authentic evidence for the cash transactions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
