Working-capital adjustment determines whether software-services transfer-pricing margins fall within the statutory tolerance range, eliminating any ad...
Permanent establishment deductions upheld for expatriate salaries, direct costs and trading losses, while head-office costs require fresh classificati...
Data transmission equipment classification under CTSH 8517 62 remains distinct from residual classification, with exemption evidence requiring scrutin...
The appellant failed to prove the legitimate source for acquisition of the subject property, and the Appellate Tribunal upheld the Provisional Attachment Order treating the amount as proceeds of crime derived from NRHM funds. The prosecution complaint was filed within the prescribed time limit. At this interim stage, the attachment of properties continues till the final disposal of the prosecution case. The appeal regarding seizure of Rs. 9.50 lakh, treated as proceeds of crime, was also dismissed as the appellant could not provide authentic evidence for the cash transactions.
The appellant failed to prove the legitimate source for acquisition of the subject property, and the Appellate Tribunal upheld the Provisional Attachment Order treating the amount as proceeds of crime derived from NRHM funds. The prosecution complaint was filed within the prescribed time limit. At this interim stage, the attachment of properties continues till the final disposal of the prosecution case. The appeal regarding seizure of Rs. 9.50 lakh, treated as proceeds of crime, was also dismissed as the appellant could not provide authentic evidence for the cash transactions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
