Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
The appellant failed to prove the legitimate source for acquisition of the subject property, and the Appellate Tribunal upheld the Provisional Attachment Order treating the amount as proceeds of crime derived from NRHM funds. The prosecution complaint was filed within the prescribed time limit. At this interim stage, the attachment of properties continues till the final disposal of the prosecution case. The appeal regarding seizure of Rs. 9.50 lakh, treated as proceeds of crime, was also dismissed as the appellant could not provide authentic evidence for the cash transactions.
The appellant failed to prove the legitimate source for acquisition of the subject property, and the Appellate Tribunal upheld the Provisional Attachment Order treating the amount as proceeds of crime derived from NRHM funds. The prosecution complaint was filed within the prescribed time limit. At this interim stage, the attachment of properties continues till the final disposal of the prosecution case. The appeal regarding seizure of Rs. 9.50 lakh, treated as proceeds of crime, was also dismissed as the appellant could not provide authentic evidence for the cash transactions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
