Specialized Investment Fund distribution now requires dedicated certification, while transitional recognition preserves existing qualified distributor...
Overlapping GST proceedings require Central and State authorities to designate one competent authority for coordinated adjudication of the same matter...
Composite healthcare supplies retain exemption when patient care is the contract's essential character, despite payment through an implementing agency...
The appeals under PMLA were allowed. The freezing/attachment order would continue during the investigation period of 365 days or pendency of the case before the Court concerning offenses under the Act of 2002. However, after the expiry of over 2 years since the freezing order without a prosecution complaint filed against any accused, the impugned order lapsed due to the efflux of time. Consequently, the Appellate Tribunal set aside the impugned order declaring the freezing order and its confirmation to have lapsed in the absence of a prosecution complaint against any accused.
The appeals under PMLA were allowed. The freezing/attachment order would continue during the investigation period of 365 days or pendency of the case before the Court concerning offenses under the Act of 2002. However, after the expiry of over 2 years since the freezing order without a prosecution complaint filed against any accused, the impugned order lapsed due to the efflux of time. Consequently, the Appellate Tribunal set aside the impugned order declaring the freezing order and its confirmation to have lapsed in the absence of a prosecution complaint against any accused.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
