Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
The appeals under PMLA were allowed. The freezing/attachment order would continue during the investigation period of 365 days or pendency of the case before the Court concerning offenses under the Act of 2002. However, after the expiry of over 2 years since the freezing order without a prosecution complaint filed against any accused, the impugned order lapsed due to the efflux of time. Consequently, the Appellate Tribunal set aside the impugned order declaring the freezing order and its confirmation to have lapsed in the absence of a prosecution complaint against any accused.
The appeals under PMLA were allowed. The freezing/attachment order would continue during the investigation period of 365 days or pendency of the case before the Court concerning offenses under the Act of 2002. However, after the expiry of over 2 years since the freezing order without a prosecution complaint filed against any accused, the impugned order lapsed due to the efflux of time. Consequently, the Appellate Tribunal set aside the impugned order declaring the freezing order and its confirmation to have lapsed in the absence of a prosecution complaint against any accused.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
