Transfer pricing and tax deductions upheld on established principles, while employee contributions and warranty provisions returned for fresh examinat...
Captive transfer pricing relies on industrial consumer tariffs, while genuine quotations can benchmark effluent treatment transfers under the Other Me...
Specific tariff classification for ophthalmic instruments and extended limitation principles determine the treatment of duty demands, confiscation, an...
Integrated golf function determines classification, placing launch monitors and simulators under other golf equipment rather than measuring instrument...
Public servant status under anti-corruption law extends to recognised stock exchange leadership; constitutional and sanction challenges do not succeed...
Acquiescence, homebuyer protection and clean-slate resolution principles prevent landowners from disrupting an integrated project through late termina...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1001 to 1020 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal held that the assessee is eligible to claim set-off of accumulated loss and unabsorbed depreciation u/s 72AB of the Income Tax Act after fulfilling the prescribed conditions related to merger. The Assessing Officer erred in interpreting that the claim could be made only after completion of the mandatory period. The Tribunal directed to allow the claim in accordance with Section 72AB. Regarding disallowance u/s 36(1)(viia), the Tribunal relied on its earlier order and held that the assessee, being a cooperative bank, is entitled to deduction for provision for bad and doubtful debts irrespective of rural or non-rural advances, subject to the statutory limit. The Revenue's appeal was dismissed.
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal held that the assessee is eligible to claim set-off of accumulated loss and unabsorbed depreciation u/s 72AB of the Income Tax Act after fulfilling the prescribed conditions related to merger. The Assessing Officer erred in interpreting that the claim could be made only after completion of the mandatory period. The Tribunal directed to allow the claim in accordance with Section 72AB. Regarding disallowance u/s 36(1)(viia), the Tribunal relied on its earlier order and held that the assessee, being a cooperative bank, is entitled to deduction for provision for bad and doubtful debts irrespective of rural or non-rural advances, subject to the statutory limit. The Revenue's appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.