Arrest safeguards and transit remand requirements invalidated detention following inter-State transfer without communicated grounds or magistrate auth...
Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal held that the assessee is eligible to claim set-off of accumulated loss and unabsorbed depreciation u/s 72AB of the Income Tax Act after fulfilling the prescribed conditions related to merger. The Assessing Officer erred in interpreting that the claim could be made only after completion of the mandatory period. The Tribunal directed to allow the claim in accordance with Section 72AB. Regarding disallowance u/s 36(1)(viia), the Tribunal relied on its earlier order and held that the assessee, being a cooperative bank, is entitled to deduction for provision for bad and doubtful debts irrespective of rural or non-rural advances, subject to the statutory limit. The Revenue's appeal was dismissed.
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal held that the assessee is eligible to claim set-off of accumulated loss and unabsorbed depreciation u/s 72AB of the Income Tax Act after fulfilling the prescribed conditions related to merger. The Assessing Officer erred in interpreting that the claim could be made only after completion of the mandatory period. The Tribunal directed to allow the claim in accordance with Section 72AB. Regarding disallowance u/s 36(1)(viia), the Tribunal relied on its earlier order and held that the assessee, being a cooperative bank, is entitled to deduction for provision for bad and doubtful debts irrespective of rural or non-rural advances, subject to the statutory limit. The Revenue's appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.