Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
561 to 580 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by the petitioner challenging the Order-in-Original issued under the CGST/AGST Act, 2017, denying input tax credit (ITC) and refund of ITC on zero-rated supplies. The Court held that the petitioner was provided an adequate opportunity to respond to the Demand-cum-Show Cause Notice but failed to submit an effective reply or avail personal hearing after seeking time. Principles of natural justice were not violated. The petitioner was directed to avail the statutory remedy of appeal u/s 107 of the CGST/AGST Act against the Order-in-Original, instead of directly approaching the High Court through a writ petition.
The High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by the petitioner challenging the Order-in-Original issued under the CGST/AGST Act, 2017, denying input tax credit (ITC) and refund of ITC on zero-rated supplies. The Court held that the petitioner was provided an adequate opportunity to respond to the Demand-cum-Show Cause Notice but failed to submit an effective reply or avail personal hearing after seeking time. Principles of natural justice were not violated. The petitioner was directed to avail the statutory remedy of appeal u/s 107 of the CGST/AGST Act against the Order-in-Original, instead of directly approaching the High Court through a writ petition.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
