Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal partly allowed the appeal. It directed the Assessing Officer to delete the addition of Rs. 66,825/- from the assessee's agricultural income and sustained the addition of Rs. 15,525/-. Regarding the addition in the name of the assessee's wife, the Tribunal held that since she is an independently assessed taxpayer and co-owner of the land, the income cannot be included in the assessee's hands based on presumptions and assumptions without substantive evidence. The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)'s order and directed the deletion of the addition made in the assessee's hands pertaining to wife's income.
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal partly allowed the appeal. It directed the Assessing Officer to delete the addition of Rs. 66,825/- from the assessee's agricultural income and sustained the addition of Rs. 15,525/-. Regarding the addition in the name of the assessee's wife, the Tribunal held that since she is an independently assessed taxpayer and co-owner of the land, the income cannot be included in the assessee's hands based on presumptions and assumptions without substantive evidence. The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)'s order and directed the deletion of the addition made in the assessee's hands pertaining to wife's income.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.