Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Automated Free Sale and Commerce Certificates enable paperless processing while retaining risk-based manual verification for selected exporter applica...
Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) set aside the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] under the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC) and remitted the matter back to CIT(A) for de novo adjudication. The assessee's request for a personal hearing before CIT(A) was rejected, violating Rule 12 of the Faceless Appeals Rules 2021 which mandates providing a virtual hearing if requested by the assessee. Following the Bank of India case, the ITAT directed CIT(A) to grant an opportunity for a virtual hearing and pass a fresh speaking order in accordance with the law.
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) set aside the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] under the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC) and remitted the matter back to CIT(A) for de novo adjudication. The assessee's request for a personal hearing before CIT(A) was rejected, violating Rule 12 of the Faceless Appeals Rules 2021 which mandates providing a virtual hearing if requested by the assessee. Following the Bank of India case, the ITAT directed CIT(A) to grant an opportunity for a virtual hearing and pass a fresh speaking order in accordance with the law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
