Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The High Court held that the Foreign Trade Policy cannot, by itself, authorize the levy of interest u/s 28AA of the Customs Act, 1962, for the recovery of wrongly availed amounts against duty credit scrips as rewards formulated under the Service Exports from India Scheme. The levy of interest must be supported by plenary legislation. While the Foreign Trade Policy contemplated that if any person is found ineligible for the benefit under any Scheme, the amount would have to be refunded along with interest u/s 28AA of the Customs Act, 1962, the Court ruled that no provision of the Act under which the Foreign Trade Policy has been framed has been pointed out to show that the provisions of Section 28AA have been made applicable for levying interest on any person who is found ineligible for any benefit received under the terms of any Scheme under the Foreign Trade Policy. Consequently, the petitioner succeeded, and the writ petition was allowed by the High Court.
The High Court held that the Foreign Trade Policy cannot, by itself, authorize the levy of interest u/s 28AA of the Customs Act, 1962, for the recovery of wrongly availed amounts against duty credit scrips as rewards formulated under the Service Exports from India Scheme. The levy of interest must be supported by plenary legislation. While the Foreign Trade Policy contemplated that if any person is found ineligible for the benefit under any Scheme, the amount would have to be refunded along with interest u/s 28AA of the Customs Act, 1962, the Court ruled that no provision of the Act under which the Foreign Trade Policy has been framed has been pointed out to show that the provisions of Section 28AA have been made applicable for levying interest on any person who is found ineligible for any benefit received under the terms of any Scheme under the Foreign Trade Policy. Consequently, the petitioner succeeded, and the writ petition was allowed by the High Court.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.