Toy balloon tariff classification: functional heading prevails over residual rubber and festive article headings, supporting penalties for deliberate ...
Customs valuation using comparable contemporaneous imports can displace declared value, while missing speaking orders require pursuit before competent...
Foreign customs declarations and importer admissions established undervaluation, supporting sequential value redetermination, differential duty, and m...
Customs seizure safeguards prevent detention-based limitation avoidance and invalidate provisional release conditions for imported vehicles under an i...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
361 to 380 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Whether anti-dumping duty (ADD) is applicable on color coated aluminum coils imported as coated with Styrene/Butyl Methacrylate Copolymer, other than PE/PVDF. - The Tribunal found that the Trade TRU had clarified through Circular No.45/2017-Customs (ADD) that "color coated aluminum foil with either PE (Polyester) coating or PVDF (Fluorine-carbon), coating falling under CTH 7607" is excluded from the scope of the product under consideration (PUC) for ADD. 3. However, the Tribunal observed that the TRU had added the words "with either PE (Polyester) coating or PVDF (Fluorine-carbon), coating falling under CTH 7607" while issuing the circular, which led to the revenue restricting the exclusion. 4. The Tribunal noted that the Principal Bench had previously held that the product is not manufactured in India, and the Designated Authority had supported excluding color coated aluminum foil from the scope of ADD. 5. The Tribunal found merit in the appellant's contention that the purpose of imposing ADD is to safeguard the interests of the domestic industry.
Whether anti-dumping duty (ADD) is applicable on color coated aluminum coils imported as coated with Styrene/Butyl Methacrylate Copolymer, other than PE/PVDF. - The Tribunal found that the Trade TRU had clarified through Circular No.45/2017-Customs (ADD) that "color coated aluminum foil with either PE (Polyester) coating or PVDF (Fluorine-carbon), coating falling under CTH 7607" is excluded from the scope of the product under consideration (PUC) for ADD. 3. However, the Tribunal observed that the TRU had added the words "with either PE (Polyester) coating or PVDF (Fluorine-carbon), coating falling under CTH 7607" while issuing the circular, which led to the revenue restricting the exclusion. 4. The Tribunal noted that the Principal Bench had previously held that the product is not manufactured in India, and the Designated Authority had supported excluding color coated aluminum foil from the scope of ADD. 5. The Tribunal found merit in the appellant's contention that the purpose of imposing ADD is to safeguard the interests of the domestic industry.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
