Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The petitioner issued two post-dated cheques bearing No. 622623 for Rs. 93,00,000/- and No. 622624 for Rs. 1,54,00,000/- to the respondent as per a Deed of Undertaking. The Deed stipulated that the petitioner would clear GST of Rs. 9,63,00,000/- for a firm, out of which 10% (Rs. 33,00,000/-) would be paid to the respondent. If the GST rate was 2%, the amount payable would be Rs. 1,54,00,000/-. The cheques were issued subject to fulfillment of certain conditions. The High Court held that such a stipulation regarding issuance of cheques could be valid. It found no ground to quash the complaint u/s 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act or the cognizance taken by the Judicial Magistrate. The issues raised appeared to be matters for trial. The High Court rejected the petition invoking inherent powers for quashing, holding that no case for quashing was made out.
The petitioner issued two post-dated cheques bearing No. 622623 for Rs. 93,00,000/- and No. 622624 for Rs. 1,54,00,000/- to the respondent as per a Deed of Undertaking. The Deed stipulated that the petitioner would clear GST of Rs. 9,63,00,000/- for a firm, out of which 10% (Rs. 33,00,000/-) would be paid to the respondent. If the GST rate was 2%, the amount payable would be Rs. 1,54,00,000/-. The cheques were issued subject to fulfillment of certain conditions. The High Court held that such a stipulation regarding issuance of cheques could be valid. It found no ground to quash the complaint u/s 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act or the cognizance taken by the Judicial Magistrate. The issues raised appeared to be matters for trial. The High Court rejected the petition invoking inherent powers for quashing, holding that no case for quashing was made out.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
