Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
The High Court found merit in the petitioner's submission that the impugned order rejecting the claim for Input Tax Credit did not consider the documents submitted, such as E-way bills, tax invoices, lorry receipts, and weighbridge slips. The court held that the order was passed without applying mind to the objections and evidence. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the petitioner was granted an opportunity to submit objections and relevant documentary evidence within two weeks. Upon submission of the reply or documents, a fresh order would be passed after considering them and affording the petitioner a reasonable opportunity.
The High Court found merit in the petitioner's submission that the impugned order rejecting the claim for Input Tax Credit did not consider the documents submitted, such as E-way bills, tax invoices, lorry receipts, and weighbridge slips. The court held that the order was passed without applying mind to the objections and evidence. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the petitioner was granted an opportunity to submit objections and relevant documentary evidence within two weeks. Upon submission of the reply or documents, a fresh order would be passed after considering them and affording the petitioner a reasonable opportunity.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
