Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Highlights - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Income Tax
  • Direct Taxes
  • Benami Property
  • Central GST Laws
  • SGST - State GST Laws
  • Customs
  • FTP - Foreign Trade Policy
  • SEZ - Special Economic Zone
  • FEMA - Foreign Exchange Management
  • Companies Law
  • SEBI - Securities & Exchange Board of India
  • IBC - Insolvency and Bankruptcy
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA - Money-Laundering
  • Indian Laws
  • Bill / Finance Bills
  • Wealth Tax
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Month:
---- All Months ----
  • ---- All Months ----
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
Year:
---- All Years ----
  • ---- All Years ----
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
Relevance Default Date
    Valid documents and no operative export ban defeat misdeclaration findings in ferrous scrap imports from UAE.
    Penalty under section 112(b) failed where dealing with confiscable goods and required knowledge were not proved.
    SEZ authorised operations shield customs duty demand, with interest and penalties failing when the notice lacks the necessary allegation.
    EOU duty exemption and limitation issues decide customs liability, excise demand, adjustment, and penalties for marble clearances
    Misclassification alone does not trigger confiscation or penalty when goods are not otherwise liable to confiscation.
    Principal function test keeps multifunction relays under relay classification; exemption allowed for sub-7 ampere products, penalties set aside.
    Maintainability in baggage disputes, valuation by confirmed invoice, and redemption without compulsory re-export upheld by tribunal.
    Preferential mortgage and late perfection of security interest were rejected, sustaining avoidance under insolvency law.
    Pre-existing dispute bars insolvency admission where performance, quality and termination of work orders remain genuinely contested.
    Nature of debt under IBC requires fuller scrutiny before rejecting a Section 7 application on maintainability.
    Operational debt under contract survives despite missing invoices; no real pre-existing dispute blocked Section 9 insolvency proceedings.
    May 21, 2026   Case Laws Money Laundering
    Custodial interrogation and prima facie corruption material justified refusal of anticipatory bail in a serious economic offence.
    Joint venture revenue sharing with hospitals was not a taxable service; service tax demand, interest and penalty were set aside.
    Statutory notice and debt presumption failed as probable defence rebutted cheque dishonour liability
    Revised mutual fund MCR reporting expands scheme categories and data fields from June 2026 onwards.
    Entry Inward and Vessel Sail-out Clearance must not depend on physical boarding; risk-based customs boarding remains separate.
    Restoration of cancelled GST registration permitted after filing pending returns and compliance with tax obligations
    Release of detained perishable goods turns on prima facie ownership and compliance with statutory payment requirements.
    Writ jurisdiction and statutory appeal remedy: challenge sent to GSTAT with mandatory pre-deposit and notified timeline.
    Retrospective GST registration cancellation requires stated grounds and reasons; unreasoned notice and order were quashed.
❯❯
Maximize Maximize Maximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

+

Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

NOTE:

Highlights
Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
Results Found:
Show All Summaries Hide All Summaries

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
No Records Found

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

whatsapp Join Channel
Showing Results for : Reset Filters

The High Court's decision centers around the interpretation of...

Court Rules Provisional Tax Attachments Lapse After One Year; No Extensions Allowed Under CGST/SGST Acts.

Contents
Summary
Note

Note

-

Bookmark

Print

Print

GST November 30, 2024 Case Laws HC
The High Court's decision centers around the interpretation of Section 83 of the CGST/SGST Acts, which deals with provisional attachment orders. The key points are: Section 83(2) clearly states that a provisional attachment order will cease to have effect after one year from its issuance. Unlike the Income Tax Act, the GST Acts do not provide for extending this one-year period. The court held that accepting the Revenue's contention of issuing repeated attachment orders would violate the statute's language and legislative intent. The court relied on Supreme Court precedents like Radha Krishnan Industries and Vodafone International Holdings, which emphasize interpreting statutes based on their plain meaning and not supplying words or giving different meanings, even if it serves a larger public interest. Consequently, the court quashed the impugned attachment orders, declaring that Section 83 does not authorize fresh attachment orders after the one-year period specified in Section 83(2).

Topics

Acts Income Tax