Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Highlights - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Income Tax
  • Direct Taxes
  • Benami Property
  • Central GST Laws
  • SGST - State GST Laws
  • Customs
  • FTP - Foreign Trade Policy
  • SEZ - Special Economic Zone
  • FEMA - Foreign Exchange Management
  • Companies Law
  • SEBI - Securities & Exchange Board of India
  • IBC - Insolvency and Bankruptcy
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA - Money-Laundering
  • Indian Laws
  • Bill / Finance Bills
  • Wealth Tax
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Month:
---- All Months ----
  • ---- All Months ----
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
Year:
---- All Years ----
  • ---- All Years ----
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
Relevance Default Date
    Vicarious liability of directors under tax offence provisions: discharge set aside where common finding on day-to-day control failed.
    Search reassessment limits and post-search procedure restrict reopening, with liability cessation addition deleted
    Inadmissible electronic evidence and loan transaction exclusion defeated penalty under cash receipt restrictions.
    Lack of inquiry on stamp duty value difference justified section 263 revision and fresh verification.
    Make available test under DTAA applied to repair and overhaul payments, so no TDS obligation arose.
    Reassessment on borrowed satisfaction and double addition under section 68 fail where purchases and sales were already recorded.
    Borrowed satisfaction and section 68 addition failed where reopening lacked live nexus and documents proved genuine receipts.
    Notional interest on slump sale balance deleted as commercially expedient arrangement, with consistency in revenue treatment supporting the assessee.
    Real income theory and corroborated cash explanations: ITAT upheld deletion of one addition and sustained the balance.
    Bad debt deduction and section 158A procedure upheld on distinct write-off, no double deduction, and pending High Court issue
    Corpus donations for construction treated as capital receipts and held not taxable despite lack of trust registration.
    CSR donation qualifies for section 80G deduction where statutory conditions are met despite business expense disallowance.
    Beneficial ownership of bank account controls section 68 addition where deposits were made in trust account, not assessee's account.
    Penalty not automatic on deemed additions and omitted fixed deposit interest; each item must be independently tested for concealment.
    Holding period for immovable property starts when enforceable rights arise, making the gain short-term capital gain.
    Royalty and subcontract disallowances sent back for fresh verification; consequential penalty under section 270A also kept open.
    Retrospective tolerance band and agreement-date indexation defeat property tax additions; unexplained investment remanded for verification
    Cost recovery charges for CFS customs deployment upheld; prior conduct, res judicata and estoppel barred renewed challenge.
    Written acceptance of enhanced import value does not waive the right to challenge reassessment under customs law.
    Incomplete BIS testing cannot justify reclassification or confiscatory action; declared customs classification restored and enhanced redemption fine s...
❯❯
Maximize Maximize Maximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

+

Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

NOTE:

Highlights
Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
Results Found:
Show All Summaries Hide All Summaries

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
No Records Found

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

whatsapp Join Channel
Showing Results for : Reset Filters

The High Court's decision centers around the interpretation of...

Court Rules Provisional Tax Attachments Lapse After One Year; No Extensions Allowed Under CGST/SGST Acts.

Contents
Summary
Note

Note

-

Bookmark

Print

Print

GST November 30, 2024 Case Laws HC
The High Court's decision centers around the interpretation of Section 83 of the CGST/SGST Acts, which deals with provisional attachment orders. The key points are: Section 83(2) clearly states that a provisional attachment order will cease to have effect after one year from its issuance. Unlike the Income Tax Act, the GST Acts do not provide for extending this one-year period. The court held that accepting the Revenue's contention of issuing repeated attachment orders would violate the statute's language and legislative intent. The court relied on Supreme Court precedents like Radha Krishnan Industries and Vodafone International Holdings, which emphasize interpreting statutes based on their plain meaning and not supplying words or giving different meanings, even if it serves a larger public interest. Consequently, the court quashed the impugned attachment orders, declaring that Section 83 does not authorize fresh attachment orders after the one-year period specified in Section 83(2).

Topics

Acts Income Tax