Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Deduction of broken period interest paid on securities and deduction of expenditure incurred on the issue of Fully Convertible Debentures (FCDs). Regarding broken period interest, the court affirmed the assessee's method of accounting, relying on previous decisions that allowed such deduction without resulting in revenue loss. On FCDs issue expenses, the court sided with the assessee, citing precedents that categorized such expenses as revenue expenditure eligible for deduction, rejecting the revenue department's contention that the intention was to increase capital. The court's decisions upheld the assessee's claims on both issues against the revenue authorities' objections.
Deduction of broken period interest paid on securities and deduction of expenditure incurred on the issue of Fully Convertible Debentures (FCDs). Regarding broken period interest, the court affirmed the assessee's method of accounting, relying on previous decisions that allowed such deduction without resulting in revenue loss. On FCDs issue expenses, the court sided with the assessee, citing precedents that categorized such expenses as revenue expenditure eligible for deduction, rejecting the revenue department's contention that the intention was to increase capital. The court's decisions upheld the assessee's claims on both issues against the revenue authorities' objections.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.