Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Section 147 allows reopening of assessments in exceptional cases where the Assessing Officer has reason to believe income has escaped assessment. Concluded assessments should not be interfered with lightly. If the reopening ground cannot be sustained, there is little rationale for expanding reassessment proceedings. A strict interpretation of Section 147 is warranted given the nature of unsettling concluded assessments. Courts have held reassessment is confined to issues forming the reasons for reopening. Explanation 3 to Section 147 clarifies the AO can assess other issues noticed subsequently but does not override Section 147's plain language. The AO cannot assess other incomes where no addition is made on the reopening reasons. No substantial question of law arises.
Section 147 allows reopening of assessments in exceptional cases where the Assessing Officer has reason to believe income has escaped assessment. Concluded assessments should not be interfered with lightly. If the reopening ground cannot be sustained, there is little rationale for expanding reassessment proceedings. A strict interpretation of Section 147 is warranted given the nature of unsettling concluded assessments. Courts have held reassessment is confined to issues forming the reasons for reopening. Explanation 3 to Section 147 clarifies the AO can assess other issues noticed subsequently but does not override Section 147's plain language. The AO cannot assess other incomes where no addition is made on the reopening reasons. No substantial question of law arises.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.