Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Transfer pricing adjustment regarding inclusion of E4e Healthcare as a comparable company. Assessee objected due to unavailability of annual report. However, objections were not adjudicated as Transfer Pricing Officer determined arm's length price adjustment as nil for the relevant year. Assessee's contention that E4e Healthcare is functionally dissimilar and cannot be included as a comparable was not considered by any authority. Orders passed by authorities were based on incorrect assumptions.
Transfer pricing adjustment regarding inclusion of E4e Healthcare as a comparable company. Assessee objected due to unavailability of annual report. However, objections were not adjudicated as Transfer Pricing Officer determined arm's length price adjustment as nil for the relevant year. Assessee's contention that E4e Healthcare is functionally dissimilar and cannot be included as a comparable was not considered by any authority. Orders passed by authorities were based on incorrect assumptions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.