Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Appellants' right to challenge the enhancement of declared values for imported goods, even after initially requesting expedited clearance. The key points are: Section 17 of the Customs Act mandates a speaking order for reassessment at variance with self-assessment. Mere requests for expedited clearance cannot be construed as abandonment of the right to appeal reassessment. The proper officer must provide reasons for rejecting declared values before reassessment. Enhancing values solely based on NIDB data without corroborative evidence is unwarranted. Reassessment must comply with rules, be reasoned, and based on tangible justifiable material. The High Court allowed the appeals, setting aside CESTAT orders and restoring the Commissioner (Appeals) order.
Appellants' right to challenge the enhancement of declared values for imported goods, even after initially requesting expedited clearance. The key points are: Section 17 of the Customs Act mandates a speaking order for reassessment at variance with self-assessment. Mere requests for expedited clearance cannot be construed as abandonment of the right to appeal reassessment. The proper officer must provide reasons for rejecting declared values before reassessment. Enhancing values solely based on NIDB data without corroborative evidence is unwarranted. Reassessment must comply with rules, be reasoned, and based on tangible justifiable material. The High Court allowed the appeals, setting aside CESTAT orders and restoring the Commissioner (Appeals) order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.