Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
Necessary-party requirements limit impleadment of independent entities, while deferred consideration does not create an appealable adverse determinati...
Food supplement classification requires common parlance and authoritative tests, preventing treatment as proprietary Ayurvedic medicines without suppo...
Petitioner's GST registration was cancelled as petitioner had stopped business at registered premises and issued fake invoices without actual supply of goods. Original authority found petitioner not conducting business at registered premises based on landlord's statement that premises were leased out to petitioner for iron and steel business from 2012 to May 2017, but thereafter no business conducted and premises leased to another person unrelated to petitioner. Original authority held details provided during VAT to GST migration were false, warranting cancellation of registration. Appellate authority upheld cancellation. High Court found no reason to interfere with findings, noting petitioner can apply for fresh registration if intending to restart business. Writ petition dismissed.
Petitioner's GST registration was cancelled as petitioner had stopped business at registered premises and issued fake invoices without actual supply of goods. Original authority found petitioner not conducting business at registered premises based on landlord's statement that premises were leased out to petitioner for iron and steel business from 2012 to May 2017, but thereafter no business conducted and premises leased to another person unrelated to petitioner. Original authority held details provided during VAT to GST migration were false, warranting cancellation of registration. Appellate authority upheld cancellation. High Court found no reason to interfere with findings, noting petitioner can apply for fresh registration if intending to restart business. Writ petition dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
