Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Petitioner's GST registration was cancelled as petitioner had stopped business at registered premises and issued fake invoices without actual supply of goods. Original authority found petitioner not conducting business at registered premises based on landlord's statement that premises were leased out to petitioner for iron and steel business from 2012 to May 2017, but thereafter no business conducted and premises leased to another person unrelated to petitioner. Original authority held details provided during VAT to GST migration were false, warranting cancellation of registration. Appellate authority upheld cancellation. High Court found no reason to interfere with findings, noting petitioner can apply for fresh registration if intending to restart business. Writ petition dismissed.
Petitioner's GST registration was cancelled as petitioner had stopped business at registered premises and issued fake invoices without actual supply of goods. Original authority found petitioner not conducting business at registered premises based on landlord's statement that premises were leased out to petitioner for iron and steel business from 2012 to May 2017, but thereafter no business conducted and premises leased to another person unrelated to petitioner. Original authority held details provided during VAT to GST migration were false, warranting cancellation of registration. Appellate authority upheld cancellation. High Court found no reason to interfere with findings, noting petitioner can apply for fresh registration if intending to restart business. Writ petition dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
