Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Overseas service providers provided data collection services to the respondent. The activities were merely data collection through questionnaires, with no research or interpretation. The raw data was supplied back to the respondent for further analysis. These services cannot be classified as "Market Research Services" as there was no research involved. The services were akin to an architect outsourcing land surveying, which is an input but not architectural services itself. Similarly, a tour operator hiring buses does not make it a bus service. The classification as "Online Information and Database Access or Retrieval Services" is irrelevant. The demand to classify data collection as market research cannot be sustained. Additionally, the extended period of limitation for issuing the show cause notice cannot be invoked as there was no mala fide intent or evasion. Any service tax payable would have been available as CENVAT credit, making it revenue neutral. The revenue appeal was dismissed by the CESTAT.
Overseas service providers provided data collection services to the respondent. The activities were merely data collection through questionnaires, with no research or interpretation. The raw data was supplied back to the respondent for further analysis. These services cannot be classified as "Market Research Services" as there was no research involved. The services were akin to an architect outsourcing land surveying, which is an input but not architectural services itself. Similarly, a tour operator hiring buses does not make it a bus service. The classification as "Online Information and Database Access or Retrieval Services" is irrelevant. The demand to classify data collection as market research cannot be sustained. Additionally, the extended period of limitation for issuing the show cause notice cannot be invoked as there was no mala fide intent or evasion. Any service tax payable would have been available as CENVAT credit, making it revenue neutral. The revenue appeal was dismissed by the CESTAT.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.