Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The assessee trust's fund-raising program, "Adbhut Hungama," involving the sale of donation coupons and a mega lucky draw, was considered a business activity by the CIT(E), leading to the denial of registration u/s 12AB. However, the surplus from this program was utilized for purchasing medical equipment and establishing medical facilities in Gujarat and Rajasthan. The Tribunal held that the one-time fund-raising program cannot be considered an organized business activity akin to selling lottery tickets, and there was no violation of Section 12AB(4). Relying on the Gujarat High Court's decision in United Way of Baroda, the Tribunal ruled that such activities do not amount to "trade," "commerce," or "business" u/s 2(15) proviso. The purpose and dominant object of the institution's activities are material in determining whether they constitute business. The Tribunal set aside the CIT(E)'s order and directed the granting of exemption u/s 12AB. Additionally, the Tribunal clarified that Section 13 provisions can only be invoked during assessment, not at the registration stage u/s 12A, citing the Gujarat High Court's decision in Bayath Kutchhi Dasha Oswal Jain Mahajan Trust.
The assessee trust's fund-raising program, "Adbhut Hungama," involving the sale of donation coupons and a mega lucky draw, was considered a business activity by the CIT(E), leading to the denial of registration u/s 12AB. However, the surplus from this program was utilized for purchasing medical equipment and establishing medical facilities in Gujarat and Rajasthan. The Tribunal held that the one-time fund-raising program cannot be considered an organized business activity akin to selling lottery tickets, and there was no violation of Section 12AB(4). Relying on the Gujarat High Court's decision in United Way of Baroda, the Tribunal ruled that such activities do not amount to "trade," "commerce," or "business" u/s 2(15) proviso. The purpose and dominant object of the institution's activities are material in determining whether they constitute business. The Tribunal set aside the CIT(E)'s order and directed the granting of exemption u/s 12AB. Additionally, the Tribunal clarified that Section 13 provisions can only be invoked during assessment, not at the registration stage u/s 12A, citing the Gujarat High Court's decision in Bayath Kutchhi Dasha Oswal Jain Mahajan Trust.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.