Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The appellant trust claimed to be formed for public charitable activities and registered under the Rajasthan Public Trust Act 1959, regularly filing its income tax returns since 1970. However, it lacked registration u/s 12AA. The issue pertained to the taxability of the trust's income at the maximum marginal rate or normal rate, and the levy of interest u/ss 234A, B, C & D. The decision in Gurjar Pushkarana Vidyotejak Mandal held that if a trust is ineligible for exemption u/ss 11 or 12 due to Section 13(1)(b), its income cannot be taxed at the maximum marginal rate but at rates specified for an AOP u/s 164(2). If Sections 13(1)(c) or 13(1)(d) are attracted, the relevant income must be taxed at the maximum marginal rate. Section 164(2) stipulates that if income is not exempt u/s 11 due to violation of Section 13(1)(c) or 13(1)(d), the relevant income shall be taxed at the maximum marginal rate, not the entire income. Since the appellant trust lacked registration u/s 12AA, its entire declared income shall be taxable at normal tax rates as per the proviso to Section 164(2), applicable to.
The appellant trust claimed to be formed for public charitable activities and registered under the Rajasthan Public Trust Act 1959, regularly filing its income tax returns since 1970. However, it lacked registration u/s 12AA. The issue pertained to the taxability of the trust's income at the maximum marginal rate or normal rate, and the levy of interest u/ss 234A, B, C & D. The decision in Gurjar Pushkarana Vidyotejak Mandal held that if a trust is ineligible for exemption u/ss 11 or 12 due to Section 13(1)(b), its income cannot be taxed at the maximum marginal rate but at rates specified for an AOP u/s 164(2). If Sections 13(1)(c) or 13(1)(d) are attracted, the relevant income must be taxed at the maximum marginal rate. Section 164(2) stipulates that if income is not exempt u/s 11 due to violation of Section 13(1)(c) or 13(1)(d), the relevant income shall be taxed at the maximum marginal rate, not the entire income. Since the appellant trust lacked registration u/s 12AA, its entire declared income shall be taxable at normal tax rates as per the proviso to Section 164(2), applicable to.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.